A while back I said something like “The government shouldn’t tell you whom to marry.” The Catholics will be outraged. Everyone else will be snickering and thinking they caught me… either in a lie or proving that I’m not a real Catholic.
But it’s kind of deceptive for only one sentence. Because, like a lot of things, this belief has a good deal of context that changes things a bit.
In an ideal world, where the laws reflect the society, and society should reflect natural law. Because, well, fighting natural law is kind of like fighting gravity. You can change the language, change the culture, change the way people think about this act or another. There’s
that lighthouse reality that states that a fact is a fact.
So yes, I believe that Natural Law should dictate who should marry. But the government isn’t about me, or even about Natural Law anymore, so what I believe is irrelevant. The justice system is taking off with our laws and doing whatever they feel like to them. It’s wrong, and some day the people who made this possible and benefit from it, will regret it when they discover they aren’t special anymore. Then it will become clear that they opened the door to oppression for themselves… as well as everyone else.
Law used to reflect natural law. People used to believe in natural law. But just because they believe in something else, doesn’t mean that natural law has changed. What has changed, is what is forbidden. IF what is forbidden stops reflecting reality as it is perceived, we loose that precious commodity that we take for granted called Rule of Law.
If you don’t have it, laws are just another dumb piece of paper, signifying nothing. If this trend continues (and there is no reason to think it won’t), this day becomes closer and closer. If it isn’t here already. THIS is why so many conservative radicals are pissed off about how many laws there are. Because if no one knows what the law is, then it amounts to the same thing… as having none. Only without the potential/theoretical freedom of anarchy.
IT used to be that in law it was acknowledged that some laws reflected natural law and some law reflected the will of the rulers. The latter was simply a force for itself. The ancient Romans where honest enough to admit and believe this and speak of it openly.
What most people seem to believe today, is that the law is civil society. BOTH sides of the argument make this mistake. I argue that we should not use the laws to make this argument, because the law as the Law–that is, Natural Law– has already failed. IF we even try to support our side by forcing everyone else to comply then what happens but it will be discredited along with the rest of the edifice. So what is true and what is enforced for the convenience of our faceless bureaucratic rulers becomes indistinguishable.
We all know what “We the People” think that DOMA is what marriage is about. But guess what? It’s not “We the People” any more.
It’s “We the Judges,” and “We the Media,” and “We the President” who are driving this train.
We the People are spitting in the wind. I just hope it’s not too late when the sleeping giant realizes this.
Beyond that, ultimately, it should be society that dictates what is marriage and what is not– not some paper in a book in some warehouse written about by Senators. Society should reflect how things actually are. Society should reflect reality, and it is from observation where these Laws come from. The closer your laws conform to Natural Law, ultimately the more stable and reasonable your society is, and the less guess work there is for new citizens.